Cloud Scalability vs Cloud Elasticity Comparison

In addition, scalability can be more granular and targeted in nature than elasticity when it comes to sizing. There are many aspects of cloud computing that CIOs, cloud engineers and IT managers should consider when deciding to add cloud services to their infrastructure. Cost, security, performance, availability and reliability are some common key areas to evaluate.

Cloud computing solutions can do just that, which is why the market has grown so much. A Replica Set defines a template for running one or more pods which then can be scaled either by an operator or automatically by Kubernetes based on some system high watermarks. Ideally each Microservice should also be elastic so that you can easily scale up or down the number of containers used for each Microservice. To autoscale you need to annotate your Replica Set with the metadata required, such as CPU limits or custom metrics so that Kubernetes knows when to scale up or down the number of pods. Then you can create a HorizontalPodAutoscaler to let Kubernetes know certain pods/ReplicaSets should participate in autoscaling. To scale your Replica Set you just need to specify how many replicas you wish by default in your Replica Set YAML file.

Now, lets say that the same system uses, instead of it’s own computers, a cloud service that is suited for it’s needs. Scalability refers to the ability for your resources to increase or decrease in size or quantity. Scalability is the ability of the system to accommodate larger loads just by adding resources either making hardware stronger or adding additional nodes .

This means they only need to scale the patient portal, not the physician or office portals. Various seasonal events and other engagement triggers (like when HBO’s Chernobyl spiked an interest in nuclear-related products) cause spikes in customer activity. These volatile ebbs and flows of workload require flexible resource management to handle the operation consistently.

😉 So I thought I’d throw my hat into the ring and try my best to explain those two terms and the differences between them. Event-driven architecture is better suited than monolithic architecture for scaling and elasticity. That could look like shopping on an ecommerce site during a busy period, ordering https://globalcloudteam.com/ an item, but then receiving an email saying it is out of stock. Asynchronous messaging and queues provide back-pressure when the front end is scaled without scaling the back end by queuing requests. Scalability enables stable growth of the system, while elasticity tackles immediate resource demands.

You can also seamlessly shift your workloads and applications to different servers or co-host them on multiple servers. Cloud scalability came as a boon to enterprises and organizations who were constantly worried about data storage and protection resources and costs. Before the cloud, data storage and management required a lot of investments and infrastructure from companies.

Follow IBM Cloud

You also heard that city officials are forecasting a growth rate for the area’s population that significantly exceeds prior growth projections from a couple of years ago. Elasticity and scalability features operate resources in a way that keeps the system’s performance smooth, both for operators and customers. Most organizations reevaluate resource planning at least annually or, during periods of rapid growth, even monthly. There are some systems I build that are much more reliable and cost-effective with automated scaling.

For a cloud to be a real cloud, rapid Elasticity is required instead of just Elasticity. According to the definition ofcloud computing, as stated by NIST in 2011, Elasticity is considered a fundamental difference between scalability and elasticity in cloud computing characteristic of cloud computing. Using the example of our Pizzeria again, you notice that several large subdivisions are being developed within a five-mile radius of your store and city.

Cloud Elasticity vs. Cloud Scalability: What’s the Difference?

With scalability and elasticity, companies can quickly scale up or down resources to keep their services running smoothly during times of need. In addition, scalability and elasticity can help companies avoid costly over-provisioning of resources by scaling up or down when needed. Opposite to this, if your business is selling software or a small company with predefined growth throughout the year, you should not worry about elastic cloud computing. With scalability and elasticity, companies can quickly scale up resources to meet demand.

For example, an inventory control application for a retail store may need to support 10x the amount of processing during the holidays. For example, if you had one user logon every hour to your site, then you’d really only need one server to handle this. However, if all of a sudden, 50,000 users all logged on at once, can your architecture quickly provision new web servers on the fly to handle this load? Policyholders wouldn’t notice any changes in performance whether you served more customers this year than the previous year. You could then release some of those virtual machines when you no longer need them, such as during off-peak months, to reduce cloud spend.

Scalability Vs. Elasticity: What’s the Difference?

Elasticity and scalability each play an important role in cloud computing today. Cloud elasticity should be considered a granular approach to dynamically allocating resources to existing infrastructure in reaction to immediate demand fluctuations. On the other hand, cloud scalability involves resource expansion on a more persistent level to meet static workload growth. The two work in conjunction and collectively reduce costs while ensuring that customers receive the same digital experience regardless at all times, now and into tomorrow. One of the primary differences between scalability and elasticity is the scale of resources involved. While elasticity usually involves the dynamic allocation of memory and CPU resources, scalability often consists of the provisioning of new servers to meet static demand growth.

• For example, if one server can handle 50 users, 2 servers can handle 100 users and 10 servers can handle 500 users.
• While elasticity usually involves the dynamic allocation of memory and CPU resources, scalability often consists of the provisioning of new servers to meet static demand growth.
• Now, lets say that the same system uses, instead of it’s own computers, a cloud service that is suited for it’s needs.
• In this case, cloud scalability is used to keep the system’s resources as consistent and efficient as possible over an extended time and growth.
• With serverless computing now a part of standard infrastructure, such as storage and compute resource provisioning, it is now a part of containers, databases, and networking as well.
• By focusing on the scalability of your IT infrastructure when you plan your software architecture, you can buy cloud services that can manage an increase in users.

With the adoption of cloud computing, scalability has become much more available and more effective. Simply put, elasticity adapts to both the increase and decrease in workload by provisioning and de-provisioning resources in an autonomous capacity. Elasticity is the ability to grow or shrink infrastructure resources dynamically as needed to adapt to workload changes in an autonomic manner, maximizing the use of resources. Scalability is used to fulfill the static needs while elasticity is used to fulfill the dynamic need of the organization. Scalability is a similar kind of service provided by the cloud where the customers have to pay-per-use. So, in conclusion, we can say that Scalability is useful where the workload remains high and increases statically.

Scalability And Databases

In such a way, scaling also considers processes to reduce the resources available in the system. Diagonal scale is a more flexible solution that combines adding and removing resources according to the current workload requirements. Scalability handles the increase and decrease of resources according to the system’s workload demands. It’s more flexible and cost-effective as it helps add or remove resources as per existing workload requirements. Сloud elasticity is a system’s ability to manage available resources according to the current workload requirements dynamically.

The goal of cloud elasticity is to avoid either over-provisioning or under-provisioning a particular service or application. In other words, it is the ability of a system to remain responsive during significantly high instantaneous spikes in user load. If the system is not adaptable but is scalable, it does not comply with the definition of Cloud.

Vertical scaling (scaling up)

Unlike elasticity, which is more of makeshift resource allocation – cloud scalability is a part of infrastructure design. If your existing architecture can quickly and automatically provision new web servers to handle this load, your design is elastic. Use of “elastic services” generally requires that all resources in the infrastructure be elastic. This includes hardware, software, QoS and other policies, connectivity and other resources that are used in elastic applications. This may become a negative trait where performance of certain applications must be guaranteed.

Learn more about vertical vs. horizontal scaling and which should be used when. Executed properly, capitalizing on elasticity can result in savings on infrastructure costs, overall. The purpose of elasticity is to match the resources allocated with the actual amount of resources needed at any given point in time. Essentially, the difference between the two is adding more cloud instances as opposed to making the instances larger. So, your store may be available all the time, but if the underlying software is not reliable, your cloud offerings are basically useless. Both, Scalability and Elasticity refer to the ability of a system to grow and shrink in capacity and resources and to this extent are effectively one and the same.

The key difference between scalability and elasticity is the level of automation. Scalability requires manual intervention, while elasticity is completely automated. This means scalability requires more effort to manage resources, while elasticity can scale with minimal effort. The supplementary infrastructure is only utilized initially in a pay-as-you-expand model and subsequently ‘shrinks’ back to a decreased volume for the rest of the year. It also ensures extra unanticipated and sudden sales activities throughout the year whenever required without affecting availability or performance. In the past, a system’s scalability relied on the company’s hardware, and thus, was severely limited in resources.

IBM Turbonomic Application Resource Management

If you can reduce the bootstrap time of each server by divided a big one into many smaller pieces of that big one. Vertical scaling is the process of accommodating growing capacity demand by upgrading existing resources . Elasticity refers to the ability of a system to drastically change computing capacity to match an ever fluctuating workload. Systems are configured so that only clients are only charged for consumed instances, regardless of sudden bursts in demand.

Reasons to Take up A Cloud Computing Certification

Manual scaling is perfect for small businesses that don’t know how to accurately forecast their growth. Environments that do not experience sudden or cyclical changes in demand may not benefit from the cost savings elastic services offer. Use of “Elastic Services” generally implies all resources in the infrastructure be elastic. This includes but not limited to hardware, software, QoS and other policies, connectivity, and other resources that are used in elastic applications. Whatever the answers, cloud computing scalability is important for your company.

You will only pay the cloud provider for your specific difference from regular usage. Having said that, it’s important to think about how your business should scale, to get the optimal experience. All storage applications and architecture established within a business need to flexible and able to accommodate this. The MTTS is also very efficient and can be measured in seconds due to fine-grained services. You end up paying 5 to 10 times as much for resources that are not really utilized, even if they are returned to the resource pool a few moments after they are provisioned.